Similarly shaped airfoils to Joukowsky 11.00% thick 6.00% camber
New! Bulk download of polars in Excel format: Joukowsky%2011.00%25%20thick%206.00%25%20camber.xlsx
Info | DAT and DXF files | Shape | Venkataraman Fit | Applications (0) | Similarly shaped airfoils
Plain Flapped Shapes: 25% flap chord | 30% flap chord | 35% flap chord | 40% flap chord
Basic Data: cl vs α | cd vs α | cm vs α | cl/cd vs α | cd vs cl | cl/cd vs cl | cl vs cd | cm vs cl | Curve fits | Lift curve slopes
Data source comparison (Codes, CFD, Wind tunnel)
Compressibility Effects: cl vs α | cd vs α | cm vs α | cl/cd vs α | cd vs cl | cl/cd vs cl | cl vs cd | cm vs cl
Roughness Effects: cl vs α | cd vs α | cm vs α | cl/cd vs α | cd vs cl | cl/cd vs cl | cl vs cd | cm vs cl
Plain Flap Effects: cl,max vs flap deflection: all flap chords | 25% flap chord | 30% flap chord | 35% flap chord | 40% flap chord
Plain Flap Effects: cl vs α for various flap deflections: 25% flap chord | 30% flap chord | 35% flap chord | 40% flap chord
Plain Flap Effects: cm vs α for various flap deflections: 25% flap chord | 30% flap chord | 35% flap chord | 40% flap chord
Plain Flap Effects: cd vs α for various flap deflections: 25% flap chord | 30% flap chord | 35% flap chord | 40% flap chord
Disclaimer: All information presented herein is delivered without guarantee or warranty of any kind. The user assumes the entire risk of use of this information.
2. Joukowsky 12.00% thick 6.00% camber
3. GOE 500
4. GOE 190 (MVA MK.18)
5. GOE 165 (MVA MK.11)
6. GOE 358
7. GOE 239 (MVA H.31)
8. MH 115 11.06%
9. SG6043
10. FX 63-120
11. NACA6410
12. Joukowsky 9.00% thick 6.00% camber
13. Joukowsky 13.00% thick 6.00% camber
14. Joukowsky 11.00% thick 7.00% camber
15. GOE 496
16. AH 79-100 B
17. Joukowsky 11.00% thick 5.00% camber
18. EPPLER 216
19. Joukowsky 12.00% thick 7.00% camber
20. GOE 176 (ALBATROS 7020)
21. Joukowsky 10.00% thick 5.00% camber