Similarly shaped airfoils to Joukowsky 16.00% thick 7.00% camber
New! Bulk download of polars in Excel format: Joukowsky%2016.00%25%20thick%207.00%25%20camber.xlsx
Info | DAT and DXF files | Shape | Venkataraman Fit | Applications (0) | Similarly shaped airfoils
Plain Flapped Shapes: 25% flap chord | 30% flap chord | 35% flap chord | 40% flap chord
Basic Data: cl vs α | cd vs α | cm vs α | cl/cd vs α | cd vs cl | cl/cd vs cl | cl vs cd | cm vs cl | Curve fits | Lift curve slopes
Data source comparison (Codes, CFD, Wind tunnel)
Compressibility Effects: cl vs α | cd vs α | cm vs α | cl/cd vs α | cd vs cl | cl/cd vs cl | cl vs cd | cm vs cl
Roughness Effects: cl vs α | cd vs α | cm vs α | cl/cd vs α | cd vs cl | cl/cd vs cl | cl vs cd | cm vs cl
Plain Flap Effects: cl,max vs flap deflection: all flap chords | 25% flap chord | 30% flap chord | 35% flap chord | 40% flap chord
Plain Flap Effects: cl vs α for various flap deflections: 25% flap chord | 30% flap chord | 35% flap chord | 40% flap chord
Plain Flap Effects: cm vs α for various flap deflections: 25% flap chord | 30% flap chord | 35% flap chord | 40% flap chord
Plain Flap Effects: cd vs α for various flap deflections: 25% flap chord | 30% flap chord | 35% flap chord | 40% flap chord
Disclaimer: All information presented herein is delivered without guarantee or warranty of any kind. The user assumes the entire risk of use of this information.
2. Joukowsky 17.00% thick 7.00% camber
3. GOE 502
4. EPPLER 591
5. Joukowsky 16.00% thick 6.00% camber
6. USA 98
7. Joukowsky 14.00% thick 7.00% camber
8. Joukowsky 18.00% thick 7.00% camber
9. Joukowsky 16.00% thick 8.00% camber
10. Joukowsky 15.00% thick 6.00% camber
11. Joukowsky 17.00% thick 8.00% camber
12. Joukowsky 17.00% thick 6.00% camber
13. Joukowsky 15.00% thick 8.00% camber
14. GOE 535
15. MID 406w2
16. FX 73-CL2-152
17. MH 113 14.62%
18. GOE 498
19. Joukowsky 14.00% thick 6.00% camber
20. Joukowsky 18.00% thick 8.00% camber
21. GOE 228 (MVA H.38)