HG(1)-1715a
Info | DAT and DXF files | Shape | Venkataraman Fit | Applications (0) | Similarly shaped airfoils
Plain Flapped Shapes: 25% flap chord | 30% flap chord | 35% flap chord | 40% flap chord
Basic Data: cl vs α | cd vs α | cm vs α | cl/cd vs α | cd vs cl | cl/cd vs cl | cl vs cd | cm vs cl | Curve fits | Lift curve slopes
Data source comparison (Codes, CFD, Wind tunnel)
Compressibility Effects: cl vs α | cd vs α | cm vs α | cl/cd vs α | cd vs cl | cl/cd vs cl | cl vs cd | cm vs cl
Roughness Effects: cl vs α | cd vs α | cm vs α | cl/cd vs α | cd vs cl | cl/cd vs cl | cl vs cd | cm vs cl
Plain Flap Effects: cl,max vs flap deflection: all flap chords | 25% flap chord | 30% flap chord | 35% flap chord | 40% flap chord
Plain Flap Effects: cl vs α for various flap deflections: 25% flap chord | 30% flap chord | 35% flap chord | 40% flap chord
Plain Flap Effects: cm vs α for various flap deflections: 25% flap chord | 30% flap chord | 35% flap chord | 40% flap chord
Plain Flap Effects: cd vs α for various flap deflections: 25% flap chord | 30% flap chord | 35% flap chord | 40% flap chord
Disclaimer: All information presented herein is delivered without guarantee or warranty of any kind. The user assumes the entire risk of use of this information.
DB Name: HG(1)-1715a
Family: Uncategorized
Max thickness: 14.9% at x = 23.06% chord
Max camber: 8.2% at x = 33.84% chord
Available data sources:
JavaFoil+Calcfoil stall+Eppler ext transition
XFOIL ncrit=9
NF
Notes:
Howard, R. (1992). DESIGN OF A HIGH-LIFT AIRFOIL FOR HANG-GLIDER APPLICATIONS. Technical Soaring, 16(1), 27-32. https://journals.sfu.ca/ts/index.php/ts/article/viewFile/704/662
NeuralFoil data computed using Peter Sharpe's NeuralFoil: An airfoil aerodynamics analysis tool using physics-informed machine learning, 2023, GitHub repository: https://github.com/peterdsharpe/NeuralFoil